Paul Krugman is right

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/opinion/krugman-things-to-tax.html

Krugman provides a compelling point that increasing taxes will make a significant impact on the deficit.
The increase in tax revenue would almost certianly prevent the potential downgrading of the United State's credit rating

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2011-11-28/fitch-usa-credit-rating/51451590/1

Millionaires approach Congress for a tax raise

http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/16/news/economy/tax_millionaires/

Would be great if this works and Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy are allowed to expire. Hopefully even more will be accomplished from this.

Michigan raising taxes on the poor, cutting benefits

http://www.annarbor.com/news/study-michigan-among-states-raising-poors-taxes/

Cutting EITC from 20% to 6% of federal credit seems pretty significant. Not sure Michigan can afford to be cutting taxes on businesses while more and more people fall out of the margin into poverty.

Bill Clinton discusses tax rates

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-november-8-2011/bill-clinton-pt--1?xrs=share_copy
Bill Clinton explains his view on tax policy, average tax rates and corporate tax deductions. Interesting points brought up about the cost of externalities as a factor in coal versus solar and alternative energy.

NYC smoking tax and revenue

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45152017/ns/business-us_business/#.TrV1f1ZZhWo

This is an example of a tax that could be causing people to turn to alternative options such as roll your own cigarettes or out of state purchases to avoid paying the additional cost of the tax. since cigarettes are a vice and a relatively inelastic demand for the product exists, the tax can be pretty high before people will change behaviors (resulting in deadweight loss). The tax could be past a point where revenue is maximized on the laugher curv, this has been acceptable because the change in behavior of quitting smoking is an externality that has positive consequences on health of society. But if the tax is high enough where people are turning to alternatives that still allow them to smoke, but for cheaper, then the tax is not maximizing revenue and is also not resulting in the externality of health benefits as people are abandoning the habit all together.